{"id":6672,"date":"2024-03-18T07:15:52","date_gmt":"2024-03-18T07:15:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/capstonegeocon.com\/?page_id=6672"},"modified":"2024-03-21T11:00:41","modified_gmt":"2024-03-21T11:00:41","slug":"battery-minerals","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/capstonegeocon.com\/index.php\/battery-minerals\/","title":{"rendered":"BATTERY MINERALS"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 data-wow-delay=\"ms\">\n                Delineating graphite mineralization zones using Integrated Geophysical techniques near Morogoro, Tanzania<br \/>\n                    <\/h3>\n<p><b>Country: <\/b><b>Tanzania\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 <\/b><b>Region:<\/b><b> East-Central Africa\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/b><b>Period: <\/b><b>2018\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 <\/b><b>Commodity:<\/b><b> Graphite.<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Geophysical investigation was conducted in two conjugate graphite concession totalling about <b>45<\/b> sq. km., of which about <b>50<\/b>-hectare area in these prospects were evaluated. Objective of the assessment in different areas was to gather a holistic view of the presence of graphite in a complex geological setting, one that is not visible on the surface in totality. The geological inputs suggested presence of dolomite &amp; marble along with Proterozoic granulite facies rocks &amp; biotite gneisses. Mineralization is observed to be strata bound in schistose form with these formations.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Objective of the program were meted employing two methods of survey included in the scope of work as,\u00a0<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\">Geophysical investigation by mean of Self-Potential method based on response of natural current &amp; generating anomaly response over more conductive zones, the graphite bodies being highly conductive.\u00a0<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\">Identify the potential graphite bearing area based on processing &amp; interpretation of SP survey.\u00a0<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\">2D Electrical Imaging (Resistivity &amp; IP) across the identified anomaly zones to interpret nature of the conductivity profile in the sub-surface.\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>SP method of survey assisted in identifying potential mineralization zone based on which blocks were identified for further investigation; in the process, SP data was gathered for the designated areas at <b>50<\/b> m profile spacing &amp; <b>10<\/b> m electrode interval, for a cumulative of <b>13.5<\/b> LKM.\u00a0 SP survey followed with 2D Imaging survey was conducted for a cumulative <b>2.6<\/b> LKM along <b>10<\/b> profile lines targeting a probe depth of <b>100<\/b> m from surface level.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The investigation revealed presence of mineralization zones with significant volume of potential resources and hence further exploration &amp; resource estimation have been recommended. Initial exploration in pitting revealed presence of good grade of flaky graphite presence within graphite schist instilling confidence to proceed further into detailed exploration program. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delineating graphite mineralization zones using Integrated Geophysical techniques near Morogoro, Tanzania Country: Tanzania\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Region: East-Central Africa\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Period: 2018\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Commodity: Graphite. Geophysical investigation was conducted in two conjugate graphite concession totalling about 45 sq. km., of which about 50-hectare area in these [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/capstonegeocon.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6672"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/capstonegeocon.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/capstonegeocon.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/capstonegeocon.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/capstonegeocon.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6672"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/capstonegeocon.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6672\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6767,"href":"https:\/\/capstonegeocon.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6672\/revisions\/6767"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/capstonegeocon.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6672"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}